<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lonetechie.com &#187; sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lonetechie.com/tag/sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lonetechie.com</link>
	<description>one techie, trying to make a difference</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>futuremark trademarks pwnage</title>
		<link>http://lonetechie.com/2008/03/06/futuremark-trademarks-pwnage/</link>
		<comments>http://lonetechie.com/2008/03/06/futuremark-trademarks-pwnage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LoneTechie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuremark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwnage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonetechie.com/2008/03/06/futuremark-trademarks-pwnage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So futuremark thinks they can trademark the term &#8220;pwnage&#8221;.  This has been floating around the net for a few days, but what I found funny was the followup (damage control) that they posted here. Fellow gamers, Our purpose in filing &#8230; <a href="http://lonetechie.com/2008/03/06/futuremark-trademarks-pwnage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lonetechie.com/2008/03/06/futuremark-trademarks-pwnage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

